"Documentaries...offer
aural and visual likenesses or representations of some part of the historical
world. They stand for or represent the views of individuals, groups, and
institutions...setting out to persuade us to accept their views."
Nichols
notes the maker of a documentary is often in a skewed power relationship
compared to their subjects. Because of film’s inherent ability to represent
things as they seem to be, presenting a sense of reality before the camera, depictions watched by an audience may be perceived
as reality. Hopefully, a doc filmmaker has made an effort to portray their
subjects fairly, but what if their subject ends up feeling exploited or that
they weren’t portrayed fairly?
Most documentarians obtain consent forms from
their subjects which grant final (and in most cases total) power to use their
footage and depict them in a way that serves the film best. People might feel
at ease with how they have been depicted in a film, but they might also feel
conflicted with their portrayal, as with the Siegels, the central characters in
Lauren Greenfield’s The Queen of
Versailles. They sued Greenfield unsuccessfully, claiming she had slandered
them and depicted them as crazy, greedy, and obsessed with consumerist
wealth. Greenfield prevailed in this
case, the judge ruling she had not participated in any defamatory conduct.
Perhaps why they complained was not that they felt they had really been misrepresented, but that they hadn’t been represented as better than they were. In photography, portraiture, and other visual arts, we laud the works that exceed our standard of reality, that portray things as better than they actually are, because that is how we would like to perceive them and ourselves.
In At Berkeley, Wiseman sidesteps some of these issues of representation by representing people for so long. With scenes of things like budget meetings that might last more than half an hour, it is incredibly compelling to perceive what Wiseman has put forth as the truth, perhaps because there is so much of it. What strengthens At Berkeley most, in my opinion, is his depiction of many of these people in different situations, giving us a chance to decide who they are for ourselves.
Perhaps why they complained was not that they felt they had really been misrepresented, but that they hadn’t been represented as better than they were. In photography, portraiture, and other visual arts, we laud the works that exceed our standard of reality, that portray things as better than they actually are, because that is how we would like to perceive them and ourselves.
In At Berkeley, Wiseman sidesteps some of these issues of representation by representing people for so long. With scenes of things like budget meetings that might last more than half an hour, it is incredibly compelling to perceive what Wiseman has put forth as the truth, perhaps because there is so much of it. What strengthens At Berkeley most, in my opinion, is his depiction of many of these people in different situations, giving us a chance to decide who they are for ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment